Friday
November
28
2014
10:00 am
Weather
  Search Again
  Home
  Local News
  State / National / World
  Sports
  Opinion / Letters
  Business
  Arts / Entertainment
  Lifestyle
  Obituaries
  Calendar
  Submit Event
  Comics / Games
  DJ Designers
  Archives
  Advertise With Us
  About Us
 
Supervisor candidates square off at forum
May 25, 2012, 05:00 AM By Chris Cooney Bay City News Service

Six of the seven candidates vying for an open seat on the San Mateo County Board of Supervisors met in Redwood City Thursday for a forum discussion on some of the issues facing the county as the June 5 primary election draws near.

The District Four seat, which encompasses East Palo Alto, Redwood City, Menlo Park and North Fair Oaks, has been held by Supervisor Rose Jacobs Gibson since 1999.

At Thursday’s forum — hosted by the nonprofit alliance group Thrive — the candidates squared off on varying approaches to confronting San Mateo County’s ongoing structural deficit, implementing the state’s realignment plan and creating increased revenue for the county’s coffers.

Businessman and Redwood City Planning Commissioner Ernie Schmidt suggested that the county needs to work harder to promote itself as friendly to businesses and attractive to tourists.

"Economic development is huge for me,” Schmidt said. "We should be trying to figure out how to get more people to shop here.”

Schmidt also suggested that he opposed generating revenue through new taxes. Three countywide measures on the June 5 ballot could potentially raise the transient occupancy tax, impose a new tax on parking facilities and impose a new tax on vehicle rental businesses.

"I’m not a believer that taxing and cutting are a way to prosperity,” Schmidt said.

Memo Morantes, a local business owner who has served on the San Mateo Board of Education for 11 years, agreed that promoting tourism and providing incentives to businesses are key elements to economic development.

"We need to bring that reputation outside the county, that we are business-friendly,” Morantes said.

Shelly Masur, who currently sits on the Redwood City Elementary School District Board of Trustees, called San Mateo County "asset rich and cash poor,” and said that establishing a revenue stream through the new tax measures could help prevent further cuts to services in the county’s safety net.

"Those tax measures will bring in $13 million and I do support them,” Masur said.

Menlo Park Councilman Andy Cohen suggested that removing red tape for building secondary dwelling units on single-family lots would benefit the county by increasing its property tax base, and help reduce the region’s unemployment by providing construction jobs.

Cohen said that coming up with new ideas to solve problems is something that has served him throughout his eight-year tenure on the City Council and a 20-year career as an attorney.

"I do it in the middle of the night,” Cohen said. "Fortunately that’s easy because I live near the train.”

Carlos Romero, a three-year councilman from East Palo Alto, acknowledged the county’s five-year plan to tackle its ongoing budget deficit, but called into question the decision to build a new jail that will cost an estimated $165 million to build and $30 million a year to operate.

Romero said the county should direct state realignment money toward reentry programs instead of new jail facilities.

"Let’s not use it for prisons, let’s use it for programs,” Romero said.

Menlo Park Mayor Kirsten Keith, an attorney and legal aid advocate, said that the focus needs to be squarely on job creation to address social inequities and improve the economic vitality of the region.

"Jobs are crucial,” Keith said. "If people don’t have jobs, they end up running into me in the criminal justice system.”

The other candidates agreed, each mentioning in turn the need to promote job creation and tackle the income disparity between San Mateo County’s residents with education and job training services.

Warren Slocum, former San Mateo County chief elections office and county clerk-recorder-assessor, also in the race for District Four supervisor, did not appear at Thursday’s forum.

If none of the seven candidates receive a majority vote on June 5, the two candidates with the highest number of votes will be on the ballot in November.

The candidates are required to live in the District Four, though supervisorial elections are countywide.


Print this Page Print this Page |  Bookmark and Share
<< Back
 
  


 
You are in the Archives

Exit
  RSS feed RSS
Daily Journal Quick Poll
 
How are you doing on your holiday shopping?

All done
Not even started
I'm in line right now
Got a list completed
Won't do it until the last minute
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
  
 
 
 
 
©2014 Daily Journal - San Mateo County’s homepage