Saturday
October
25
2014
8:22 am
Weather
  Search Again
  Home
  Local News
  State / National / World
  Sports
  Opinion / Letters
  Business
  Arts / Entertainment
  Lifestyle
  Obituaries
  Calendar
  Submit Event
  Comics / Games
  DJ Designers
  Archives
  Advertise With Us
  About Us
 

Check out our archive of Dining Guides - Yum!

Letter: People should decide fate of health care district
November 11, 2011, 04:10 AM Letter

Editor,

Your paper recently ran two guest perspectives regarding the Sequoia Healthcare District, known previously as the Sequoia Hospital District. The most recent piece was by Kim Griffin, RN and chair of the district’s board. She apparently was writing in response to Jack Hickey’s piece which appeared in the Oct. 25 edition of your paper under the title: "The hospital district that won’t die.” Mr. Hickey is also a district board member.

Having read both pieces, I find myself mostly in agreement with Mr. Hickey, who rightfully questions the existence of the district now that it does not operate a hospital. Ms. Griffin points out all the good things the district does today, and I doubt anyone would question their value, but she misses Mr. Hickey’s point. — the district is operating outside the bounds of its original charter.

Constitutionally, our government receives its authority from the people. In the case of the district, it received its authority to run a hospital. Now that it no longer runs a hospital, it has taken to using its tax revenue to fund whatever health issue it deems appropriate. As Ms. Griffin noted, "Today, Sequoia Healthcare District is involved with more than 40 community health programs covering almost every health care need from mental health services to hospice to hot meals for the homebound.”

If the people of the district want their tax dollars to be used in such a liberal and philanthropic fashion for health care, then indeed a district needs to be formed for that purpose; if the existing district can lawfully be transformed for such programs, then the question should be put to the voters. There is the matter of process to be followed, which is Mr. Hickey’s point; there is the matter of value, which is Ms. Griffin’s point. The vote of the people resolves both.


Matt Grocott

San Carlos

The letter writer is a member of the San Carlos City Council.



Print this Page Print this Page |  Bookmark and Share
<< Back
 
  


 
You are in the Archives

Exit
  RSS feed RSS
Daily Journal Quick Poll
 
What is the most important issue facing the United States right now?

Ebola
Islamic State
Income gap
Russia/Ukraine
Immigration
Health care
The economy
 
 
 

 
 
  
 
  
 
 
 
 
©2014 Daily Journal - San Mateo County’s homepage