Thursday
June
20
2013
3:39 am
Weather
  Home
  Local News
  State / National / World
  Sports
  Opinion / Letters
  Business
  Arts / Entertainment
  Lifestyle
  Obituaries
  Calendar
  Submit Event
  Comics / Games
  DJ Designers
  Archives
  Advertise With Us
  About Us
 

The print edition in its entirety. Click here to see it.

Our latest San Mateo and Burlingame Food & Dining Guide is out... Click here!

Click here for locations of where to find Daily Journal news racks.

Court announces further services cuts
January 31, 2013, 05:00 AM Daily Journal Staff report

Under the weight of ongoing state budget cuts, the San Mateo County Superior Court yesterday announced it will slash up to two dozen positions, close five courtrooms and suspend the majority of services in the South San Francisco and San Mateo branches.

The changes will happen as early as July 2013 and include eliminating five court commissioner positions and 16 to 21 staff members. Two judges will remain at the South San Francisco branch to conduct preliminary hearings.

San Mateo County, like all counties statewide, have seen their courts hit by state budget cuts of more than $1 billion over the past five years. The local courts have already cut staff by 30 percent, consolidated courtrooms and hearings into the Redwood City branch and trimmed service and phone hours. In September, court officials warned more would be coming down the pike if the state continued with its cuts and yesterday confirmed the reality which includes further reduction of public counter and phone hours in February.

Presiding Judge Robert Foiles called the governor's January proposed budget "extremely disappointing” for failing to restore funding to the trial courts.

"We must plan now to effectively prioritize the most essential court services to protect the public while also living within our means. We regret that this will mean further delays in many other areas,” Foiles said in a prepared statement.












Print this Page Print this Page |  Bookmark and Share
<< Back
 
  


 
  RSS feed RSS
Daily Journal Quick Poll
 
Legislators are backtracking on a bill to make local government compliance with the state's public records act optional since they don’t want to pay for it. Instead, they want voter approval to shift fiscal responsibility to locals, do you agree?

No, the state should pay for a state mandate
Yes, local governments should pay for their own paperwork
They should just drop the entire proposal
 
 

 
  
 
  
 
 
©2013 Daily Journal - San Mateo County’s homepage